An Iranian S-300-like system shown at military parade in April 2010. The components, two TELS (Transporter, Erector, Launcher) look like mock-ups. Also paraded was a 30N6 "Flap Lid B" fire control radar, also on an Iranian 'Babr' truck (same model as TEL), and a surveillance radar, most probably a Russian Nebo type.
An observer pointed out that the Iranian trucks have a much shorter wheel base than the Russian trucks used for other S-300 systems, causing the vehicles to appear rear-heavy. This is most noticeable in the fire control radar vehicle where the control cabin is completely behind the rear axle.
There is the possibly an S-300 system with only Iranian changes being locally produced vehicles. It could also be a hybrid system with minimal S-300 components and more accessible alternatives for things like surveillance radars and battery command centers. Whatever the case it is unlikely that this either represents actual deliveries from Russia of operation-ready kit, or a purely Iranian system. Iran has made some advancements in radar and related technologies needed to develop a credible SAM system, but is still far short of an S-300 comparable system. The most recent 'new' SAM system, shown only days ago, is a reverse engineered I-Hawk system with minor improvements. That is despite years of creeping I-Hawk reverse engineering.
The missile tubes deviate in detail from the real S-300 system, but this alone is inconclusive - even if Iran had live S-300 it would make sense to parade with dummy/drill tubes as is standard Iranian practice and is much safer.
There is of course the possibility that this is a deception by Iran, which could have several motives;
a) to cause doubt and thus deter Western/Israeli actions
b) to pressure Russia to supply S-300
c) to impress Iranians
Most importantly however, there is no real corroborating evidence of operational use.
On the current information it is sensible to consider that Iran may soon operationalize a SAM system in the S-300 class derived from S-300. Even if it's equivalent to S-300PT, it's still a huge leap forward and the only credible threat to IAF/USAF air strikes at medium/high altitude.
Viable 'anti-stealth' capability should not be assumed at this stage.
No comments:
Post a Comment